Skip to content

Conversation

@kinke
Copy link
Member

@kinke kinke commented Oct 1, 2024

No description provided.

@liushuyu
Copy link
Contributor

liushuyu commented Nov 4, 2024

I also have a LLVM 19 port based on the work in this pull request: https://github.com/liushuyu/ldc/tree/llvm-19

@kinke
Copy link
Member Author

kinke commented Nov 5, 2024

With more success? My mild enthusiasm was immediately killed by that LLVM assertion, which after a quick glance seemed to be an LLVM regression (as we're just trying to get some intrinsic by name).

@liushuyu
Copy link
Contributor

liushuyu commented Nov 5, 2024

With more success? My mild enthusiasm was immediately killed by that LLVM assertion, which after a quick glance seemed to be an LLVM regression (as we're just trying to get some intrinsic by name).

Yes, so mine worked around the LLVM assertions by providing the overloaded types to the intrinsic functions.

@kinke
Copy link
Member Author

kinke commented Nov 5, 2024

Oh great! Any reason for not opening an MR? I mean I'm fine with cherry-picking too if you don't want to yourself.

@liushuyu
Copy link
Contributor

liushuyu commented Nov 5, 2024

Oh great! Any reason for not opening an MR? I mean I'm fine with cherry-picking too if you don't want to yourself.

I opened the pull request at #4772. Some CI setups are required to get LLVM 19 binaries.

@kinke kinke closed this Nov 27, 2024
@kinke kinke deleted the llvm19 branch November 27, 2024 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants